Open Journals and Reviewing
By many measures, traditional publishers have been resistent to adopting policies and tools to enable OARR. This has spawned a new crop of journals pushing against this attitude; these include preprint servers, where papers can be posted before acceptance at a major outlet; open access journals which specifically shed access fees; and journals which encourage open code and data hosting. There has also been a push for open peer review systems, in response to frustration with perceived "old boys" clubs, scandals like the STAP stem cell publication, and in general, a new generation of scientists eager for alternative, less restrictive publishin schemes.
- The reviewers oath oath
- A manifesto to encourage ethical and efficacious peer review
- arxiv
- Open preprint server (started in physics, as opened up to other fields)
- bioRxiv
- arxiv-inspired biology-specific preprint service
- Peer review on top of arxiv.org (open source project from GitHub team) page
- Submit to arxiv: blog post
- OpenReview
- Networking and advocacy for open peer review
- f1000
- Open access journal; publishing for null results and less "flashy" research
- Biology Direct, PeerJ, BMC Series medical journals, eLife
- GigaScience
- Data, research, and software publishing, all open access
- Insight Journal
- Luis Ibanze
- Thought leader in OA and RR
- PlosOne
- Popular OA journa
- Victoria Stodden: empirical analysis of journal data and code policy: paper